Tag: healthcare revenue integrity

Healthcare Revenue Integrity: The Role of RAC Trackers

Healthcare revenue integrity refers to ensuring correct and compliant billing, coding, and reimbursement procedures within the healthcare sector. Maximizing revenue and reducing financial risks are the two objectives of healthcare revenue integrity, which leads to guaranteed stability and profitability of the finances of healthcare organizations.

Revenue integrity is absolutely critical in today’s complicated world of healthcare payments. Recognizing and avoiding potential sources of revenue leakage, billing mistakes, fraud, and compliance difficulties helps healthcare providers maximize their revenue streams. Effective revenue integrity procedures guarantee that healthcare organizations are paid fairly for their services while adhering to legal requirements.

The Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) tracker is a crucial tool in this aspect. A RAC tracker is a program or system created to track and examine information on medical claims, spot errors, and help businesses recover lost income. These monitors are essential for finding coding mistakes, dishonest billing procedures, and documentation gaps that might result in revenue losses or audit risks.

Healthcare Revenue Integrity: Opportunities and Challenges

Healthcare revenue integrity is vital on many levels. First, it immediately affects the viability and financial health of healthcare organizations. Organizations can obtain the funds required to provide high-quality patient care, invest in cutting-edge technologies, and onboard talented resources once they ensure accurate and appropriate reimbursement.

Additionally, revenue integrity helps organizations prevent financial losses brought on by underbilling, coding mistakes, inadequate paperwork, or compliance infractions.

Besides, revenue integrity is intimately related to legal and regulatory issues. Government organizations, including Medicare and Medicaid, and private insurers have different billing and coding requirements that healthcare organizations must abide by. Financial fines, legal punishments, and reputational harm may follow noncompliance with these restrictions.

That said, ensuring revenue integrity presents several difficulties too. The complexity of the billing and coding procedures is a significant obstacle. The reimbursement environment for healthcare is complex, with numerous payment methods, coding systems (such as ICD-10 and CPT), and reimbursement regulations. Staying on top of the continual changes and ensuring appropriate coding and invoicing can be challenging and requires ongoing training and experience.

Continue Reading

Payment Integrity In The U.S.: Uncover the “Why”

Ryan Mooney

By Ryan Mooney, general manager, Source Division, HealthEdge.

In our healthcare ecosystem, waste, fraud and abuse run rampant: in 2020 alone, healthcare spending in the U.S. exceeded $4 trillion, and estimates suggest about a quarter of that was attributed to waste. What this tells us is that an increased focus on payment integrity – and in particular, fixing its traditionally disparate practices – has the potential to greatly benefit payers, providers, and ultimately members.

At its core, payment integrity is the process by which stakeholders ensure healthcare claims are paid properly, both pre- and post-pay. It encompasses determining the correct party, membership eligibility, contractual adherence, and fraud, waste and abuse detection and prevention. In recent years, as healthcare spending continues to skyrocket, payment integrity has received more attention – and investment – than ever. And yet, it leaves much to be desired.

The Current State of Payment Integrity

A comprehensive payment integrity strategy is key to lowering costs and achieving higher quality of care for members, but the systems in place are far from perfect. With over 24 years working in payment integrity, throughout this experience I’ve found it nearly impossible not to run into issues within the system. As it stands, many parties focus on enriching the contingency model versus solving the problem. Structurally, the contingency model is flawed: when the vendor gets paid according to the quantity of errors they find, the core problem will continue, as these parties are incentivized to identify what is incorrect rather than why.

Our 2021 Voice of the Market survey of over 200 health insurance executives found that payment accuracy would help reduce administrative costs at their organization, directly impacting savings that can be reallocated for other business priorities such as considering partnerships, acquisitions, or investing in a new geography or line of business. This represents a substantial shift from the past, demonstrating how stakeholders today want to take advantage of all available resources to expand in the current landscape.

Continue Reading